The essentials
Press freedom advocates raise concerns as doxxing law expansion becomes flashpoint in journalist-lawmaker confrontation.
A confrontation between Assemblywoman Terry Schanz and journalist Nick Shirley outside the California Capitol has intensified scrutiny of AB 2624, the recently signed Safe at Home expansion protecting immigration workers from doxxing.
Shirley, who produces investigative videos about immigrant communities, became a focal point in the debate when Republicans labeled the legislation the 'Stop Nick Shirley Act', suggesting it was designed to restrict his reporting activities. The characterization highlights tensions between press freedom advocates and supporters of enhanced privacy protections.
Schanz's office allegedly pressured CalMatters to alter footage related to the Capitol incident, raising concerns about potential intimidation of media outlets. Additionally, Schanz was named in a 2025 wrongful-termination lawsuit, adding complexity to the controversy surrounding the law's implementation and its implications for journalistic access.
Other ways to read this story.
Alternative framings generated by SigNews. These are not independent sources or attributed quotations.
Doxxing law risks chilling effect on immigration reporting
Critics argue AB 2624 could restrict legitimate investigative journalism on immigration matters. The 'Stop Nick Shirley Act' label reflects concerns that doxxing protections may be applied too broadly, potentially shielding immigration workers from scrutiny. Alleged pressure on media outlets compounds fears that the law could discourage reporting on sensitive policy areas.
Law provides necessary safeguards for vulnerable immigration workers
Supporters contend AB 2624 addresses real threats against immigration service providers. The legislation creates legal recourse against harassment campaigns targeting vulnerable populations. Proponents argue that establishing doxxing penalties serves legitimate safety interests, distinct from restrictions on legitimate journalism or public debate about immigration policy.