Supreme Court to decide if DOGE records fall under transparency law
Supreme Court to decide if DOGE must disclose records under federal transparency law.
Event / Politics
Significant cases decided by the US Supreme Court during the 2026 term, including government transparency, executive privilege, and constitutional matters.
2026-10-06 to 2026-10-28 · UTC publication dates
Coverage begins 6 Oct, 02:48 UTC
Follow the documented timeline or explore the related reporting.
The Supreme Court agreed on Tuesday to hear arguments in Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington's lawsuit seeking access to public records about the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This marks the second time the high court is intervening in the case, which seeks DOGE records from its operations in the early days of President Trump's second term. The Trump administration requested the court hear the case.
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington asserts that DOGE is a federal agency and therefore must be subject to Freedom of Information Act requirements. CREW argues the public has a right to know how DOGE helped carry out a sweeping overhaul of government operations in 2025, and states that undisputed facts in the public record confirm DOGE was wielding enormous independent authority across the federal government.
The Trump administration contends that DOGE is exempt from Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requirements because it operates as a presidential advisory body. Justice Department attorneys argued that subjecting advisory bodies to discovery would trigger concerns Congress sought to avoid by excluding presidential advisory bodies from FOIA's reach, citing separation-of-powers principles.
In June 2025, the Supreme Court's conservative majority concluded that U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper ruled too broadly in ordering the government to produce DOGE-related records to CREW. The high court reined in that initial district court order, directing consideration of separation-of-powers concerns in subsequent proceedings.
U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper ruled in favor of CREW and ordered expedited processing of the group's FOIA records request. An appeals court panel also sided with CREW, but the Trump administration claims the panel ignored the Supreme Court's direction to consider separation-of-powers concerns and impermissibly authorized a sworn deposition of DOGE acting administrator Amy Gleason.
The Supreme Court will decide the legality of the Trump administration's rapid deportation of immigrants to third countries without giving them a chance to raise fears of persecution, and the indefinite detention of immigrants awaiting deportation proceedings without a chance for release on bond.
The U.S. Supreme Court reconvened on the eve of midterm elections to begin a new term that includes a fresh wave of appeals from President Donald Trump and legal challenges related to 2026 election results. The term will address multiple constitutional and policy questions including climate litigation, weapons regulations, voter eligibility, religious school funding, and Trump administration immigration enforcement policies.
The Supreme Court is considering whether to weigh in on state laws mandating display of the Ten Commandments in public school classrooms, legal shields for medical providers who mail abortion pills out of state, and regulation of prediction markets like Kalshi and Polymarket.
President Trump wants the Supreme Court to allow defamation claims against CNN from the 2020 election to go forward.
President Trump has personal appeals before the Supreme Court seeking the justices to invalidate an $83 million civil judgment against him in the E. Jean Carroll defamation suit.
The Supreme Court's new term includes decisions on whether states can ban semi-automatic weapons like the AR-15, whether states can deny federal ballots to voters who don't provide proof of citizenship on state registration forms, and whether religious schools can be blocked from taxpayer-funded programs when they discriminate against LGBTQ+ families.
The Supreme Court's first case for oral argument involves local governments suing energy companies for financial damages over alleged harms from fossil fuels. This is the first-of-its-kind dispute of this nature to reach the justices, with potentially billions of dollars at stake.
President Trump wants the Supreme Court to revive a conspiracy claim against Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee from the 2016 campaign.
A Marquette University poll found that a majority of Americans believe the Supreme Court justices are motivated mainly by politics in their decision-making and that the court, with a 6-justice conservative supermajority, rules often for Trump.
During the previous term, the Supreme Court ruled against Trump on nearly every major policy priority that reached it, striking down Trump's sweeping global tariffs program, birthright citizenship executive order, deployment of National Guard troops to U.S. cities, removal of a Federal Reserve governor, and implementation of Postal Service mail-in ballot rules.
Supreme Court to decide if DOGE must disclose records under federal transparency law.
Majority of Americans doubt Supreme Court independence, perceiving political rather than legal motivation.
Supreme Court docket adds Trump immigration detention policy case amid broader executive authority review.
Trump appeals to Supreme Court on three fronts: Carroll defamation reversal, Clinton-DNC claims revival, and CNN defamation pursuit.
Supreme Court tackles Trump appeals, climate liability, and major constitutional questions on guns, elections, and religion.