Event / Politics

Alabama Congressional Redistricting

← All events

Updated

Supreme Court and legal challenges regarding Alabama's congressional map affecting minority representation and voting rights in the 2026 midterm elections.

3 reported locations
Geography of the reported facts
  1. Washington, District of Columbia, United States
  2. Alabama, United States
  3. Montgomery, Alabama, United States

The story so far

Daily activity

0 articles
0 articles

2026-08-17 to 2026-11-14 · UTC publication dates

Coverage begins 3 Jun, 17:05 UTC

Follow the documented timeline or explore the related reporting.

What happened

The facts
  1. NAACP Legal Defense Fund vows to continue fighting the redistricting decision

    Deuel Ross, director of litigation for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, criticized the Supreme Court's decision as giving cover to discriminate against Black voters without consequence. The organization pledged to continue deploying resources to ensure Alabama voters have fair representation.

    1 corroborating report

  2. Lower court had ordered Alabama to use 2024 map with two majority-Black districts

    A three-judge federal panel previously blocked Alabama's 2023 map and ordered the state to continue using a court-drawn map from 2024 that contained two districts where Black voters constituted a majority or had an opportunity to elect candidates of their choice. This court-approved map led to the election of U.S. Representative Shomari Figures, a Black Democrat, in 2024.

    1 corroborating report

  3. Supreme Court allows Alabama to use 2023 congressional map favoring Republicans

    The U.S. Supreme Court issued an emergency order on Tuesday allowing Alabama to use a congressional map adopted in 2023 that contains only one majority-Black district out of seven total districts. The map is expected to give Republicans an opportunity to gain an additional congressional seat. The decision came after the Supreme Court's conservative majority voted 6-3 to lift a lower court injunction that had blocked the map's use.

    1 corroborating report

  4. Three liberal justices dissent from Supreme Court redistricting decision

    Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented from the Supreme Court's majority decision. In her dissent, Justice Sotomayor argued that the map discriminates against Black Alabamians and criticized the majority for rewarding Alabama's defiance of previous court orders and creating a chaotic election.

    1 corroborating report

  5. Alabama governor confirms August 11 special primary elections under new map

    Republican Governor Kay Ivey confirmed that Alabama's August 11 special primary elections would be conducted under the 2023 congressional map following the Supreme Court's decision. The special primaries affect four congressional districts where district lines would change under the new map.

    1 corroborating report

  6. Supreme Court allows Alabama to use GOP-favoring congressional map

    The Supreme Court granted Alabama's emergency appeal on Tuesday to use a congressional redistricting map adopted three years ago that contains a majority-Black population in only one of the state's seven congressional districts. The decision overrode a lower court ruling that found the redistricting plan intentionally discriminates against Black voters. The three liberal justices dissented from the order.

    1 corroborating report

  7. Court-drawn map in 2024 elections elected two Black Democratic representatives

    Under a court-ordered congressional map used in Alabama's 2024 elections, two Black Democratic representatives were elected to Congress, including U.S. Representative Shomari Figures. This map provided a majority or near-majority Black population in two of Alabama's seven congressional districts.

    1 corroborating report

  8. Alabama to hold special primary elections in August under new map

    Alabama Governor Kay Ivey confirmed that the state will use the Supreme Court-approved congressional map in special primary elections scheduled for August 11 in four congressional districts affected by the redistricting change.

    1 corroborating report

  9. NAACP Legal Defense Fund vows to continue legal challenge

    Deuel Ross, director of litigation for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, stated that the Supreme Court's decision gives cover to discrimination against Black voters and announced the fund will continue to use all its resources to fight for fair representation for Alabama voters.

    1 corroborating report

  10. Three-judge panel reaffirms finding of intentional racial discrimination in Alabama map

    Upon further review, a three-judge judicial panel reaffirmed its initial finding that there was undisputed evidence of intentional racial discrimination in Alabama's proposed congressional map and recommended that special primary elections proceed under the previously court-approved districts.

    1 corroborating report

  11. Lower court previously ruled Alabama map intentionally discriminates against Black voters

    In 2023, a three-judge panel ruled that a congressional map drawn by Alabama Republican state lawmakers intentionally diluted the voting power of Black citizens. The court determined that Alabama, which is approximately 27% Black, should have two districts where Black voters constitute a majority or near-majority population.

    1 corroborating report

  12. Supreme Court weakens Voting Rights Act in Louisiana redistricting case

    In April, the Supreme Court struck down a Black-majority district in Louisiana and weakened the federal Voting Rights Act by raising the bar for racial discrimination claims, requiring groups to show a strong inference of intentional discrimination before proceeding with a lawsuit.

    1 corroborating report

  13. Republican governors in Southern states reshape voting districts following Supreme Court ruling

    Following the Supreme Court's April ruling weakening the Voting Rights Act, Republican officials in several Southern states, including Alabama, took steps to reshape congressional voting districts with large minority populations that have elected Democrats.

    1 corroborating report

  14. Justice Sotomayor dissents, citing chaotic election under discriminatory map

    Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented from the Supreme Court majority, arguing that the decision enables a chaotic election under a never-before-used congressional map that intentionally discriminates against Black Alabamians.

    1 corroborating report

Read the coverage