Environmental groups challenge pesticide reintroduction in agricultural law
Environmental groups mobilize opposition to the pesticide provision in France's passed agricultural law.
Event / Politics
French Parliament passes emergency agricultural law featuring controversial pesticide reintroduction provision, creating government coalition tensions and threatening ministerial resignation.
2026-08-15 to 2026-11-12 · UTC publication dates
Coverage begins 21 Jul, 13:45 UTC
Follow the documented timeline or explore the related reporting.
The French Senate amended the emergency agricultural law text to add the conditional reintroduction of banned pesticides. This provision was retained by parliamentarians following the joint mixed committee (CMP) session. The government stated it was not the origin of this controversial measure.
Deputies from the government coalition suggested to the executive that it remove the pesticide reintroduction measure by amendment, which the government refused. Former Minister of Ecological Transition Agnès Pannier-Runacher (Ensemble for the Republic) denounced the measure as a government power grab and democratic denial.
The French National Assembly adopted an emergency agricultural law during the night in a tense context. The law comprises approximately 70 articles covering food sovereignty, water management, livestock, and pesticides. The law allows the French food safety agency (Anses) to conditionally reintroduce two pesticides—acetamiprid and flupyradifurone—that are banned in France but authorized in the European Union, for a limited number of struggling agricultural sectors.
The FNSEA (French farmers federation) hailed the emergency agricultural law as a major turning point, welcoming the adoption of the text as a sign of government awareness of the critical situation facing French agriculture.
Government spokesperson Maud Bregeon commented on hypothetical ministerial resignations, stating that resigning over a lost government decision is debatable, but resigning over a parliamentary vote against one's position is more complex. She neither confirmed nor denied Monique Barbut's potential resignation.
Minister of Agriculture Annie Genevard stated that the emergency agricultural law originated from farmer demonstrations at the beginning of the year and was developed in consultation with farmers. She argued it better protects farmers against unfair competition. She emphasized that acetamiprid has not been re-established in the text, noting that Anses would decide on conditional exemptions only if there is no impact on human health or the environment, an emergency situation exists, and no alternatives are available.
Monique Barbut, Minister of Ecological Transition, personally opposed the reintroduction of acetamiprid and indicated through her staff that she could resign if the law is definitively adopted with the conditional reintroduction of the two banned pesticides. She cancelled her scheduled press conference and was scheduled to meet with Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu to discuss her situation.
Environmental organizations including Greenpeace criticized the agricultural law vote, stating that the government and its allies trample on science, health, the environment, and citizen will through the pesticide reintroduction provision.
Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu called on social media (X) against instrumentalizing the emergency agricultural law for political purposes following its adoption by the National Assembly. He stated regarding acetamiprid that the parliamentary compromise does not overturn its ban and that the law's essential content cannot be reduced to this single article.
Environmental groups mobilize opposition to the pesticide provision in France's passed agricultural law.
Coalition tensions escalate as pesticide provision triggers minister's resignation threat and parliamentary dissent.
France passes emergency farm law with pesticide reintroduction, backed by farmers federation.