Artist JMSN demands Trump administration cease using song in political ads
Artist JMSN demands Trump administration stop using his song in political ads without permission.
Event / Politics
Federal court proceedings regarding Trump administration use of appropriated funds for political advertising, including judicial rulings on campaign finance violations and related disputes.
2026-10-08 to 2026-10-29 · UTC publication dates
Coverage begins 8 Oct, 01:07 UTC
Follow the documented timeline or explore the related reporting.
Attorneys for artist JMSN sent a cease-and-desist letter to White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles demanding that the Trump administration stop using his song 'Love Me' in the taxpayer-funded advertisements. The artist posted on social media that he would never authorize his music to be used for any political agenda or campaign.
U.S. District Judge Jennifer L. Rochon in New York issued a temporary restraining order on October 6, 2026, requiring the Trump administration to cancel any remaining television commercials funded with $20 million in taxpayer money. The ads, which began airing in late September, glorified Trump and echoed his political messaging going into the midterms. The order prohibits the administration from entering into, renewing, or expanding any agreement authorizing the development, creation, dissemination, placement, or airing of the challenged advertisements for two weeks.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune, a South Dakota Republican, publicly stated that the taxpayer-funded advertisements should not have been paid for with public dollars. GOP Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana similarly said that public officials should not spend public money on private ads for themselves.
The Department of Homeland Security used $20 million in congressionally appropriated funds for a National Media Campaign featuring advertisements promoting Trump and his political messaging. The Department of Homeland Security awarded LMD Agency $20 million starting September 20, 2026, for what was described as a National Media Campaign. Legal experts suggested this violated a federal statute against using congressionally appropriated money for publicity or propaganda.
After facing backlash over the taxpayer-funded ads, President Trump said he would start paying for the advertisements with his campaign account. A White House official stated there were no immediate plans to reimburse the government for the $20 million already spent on the ads.
A coalition including the nonpartisan watchdog Common Cause challenged the Trump administration's use of taxpayer funds for promotional advertisements as an illegal misuse of federal funds. The plaintiffs were represented by Democracy Forward, a nonprofit legal organization. The Democratic National Committee separately sued the Republican administration over the same ads.
Trump defended the advertisements on Monday as 'positive promotion for our Great U.S.A.' and said he would pay for future ads using his MAGA Inc. super PAC. However, on Tuesday he indicated to reporters he has not committed to reimbursing taxpayer funds already spent on the advertisements, saying 'we'll decide.'
Television advertisements promoting Trump and his political message began airing in September and have cost more than $12 million to run according to media tracking firm AdImpact. A total of $20 million in Homeland Security Department funding has been allocated to pay for the advertisements, which were drawn from a $175 million congressional appropriation to the department for immigration enforcement.
The Democratic National Committee filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on Wednesday against President Trump's administration, alleging that television advertisements promoting his political message using federal taxpayer funds violate federal propaganda laws. The complaint accuses Trump of personally directing the ads and requests the court declare them illegal and stop federal funding for them.
On Tuesday, the fifth advertisement in the campaign began airing with a notice stating it was 'paid for by the U.S. Government.' The ad promoted Trump's military actions in Venezuela earlier in 2026.
Legal experts have suggested the advertisements violate a federal statute prohibiting congressionally appropriated money from being used for 'publicity or propaganda,' and potentially other federal laws. Experts noted the recent advertisements differ from past public service announcements because they are not aimed at helping members of the public benefit from specific government programs.
Artist JMSN demands Trump administration stop using his song in political ads without permission.
Republican Senate leader Thune criticizes taxpayer funding of Trump political ads amid ongoing legal challenges.
Court blocks Trump administration's $20 million taxpayer-funded ad campaign; administration pledges to use campaign funds.
Trump administration releases fifth Venezuela military advertisement amid ongoing lawsuit over taxpayer-funded political ads.
DNC sues Trump administration for using $12 million in taxpayer funds for political ads.