Defense seeks investigation into juror who deadlocked Clancy trial
Defense seeks investigation into holdout juror Michael Desronvil; juror publicly defends himself and hires attorney.
Event / Politics
Lindsay Clancy Murder Trial
Ongoing legal proceedings in the Lindsay Clancy triple homicide case, including trial developments, jury deliberations, and procedural issues.
4 reported locations
Daily activity
25 articles0 articles
2026-09-09 to 2026-10-31 · UTC publication dates
Coverage begins 9 Sept, 08:30 UTC
Follow the documented timeline or explore the related reporting.
What happened
Patrick Clancy married Dr. Rachel Denis in Central Park
Patrick Clancy married Dr. Rachel Denis, a reproductive specialist, in Central Park in April 2026. They met while Denis was running in Central Park on a cold Saturday. The couple is expecting a baby together. Denis joined Patrick in his 60 Minutes interview to defend their relationship against social media criticism.
Lindsay Clancy strangled three children on January 24, 2023
Lindsay Clancy killed her three young children by strangling them at their home in Duxbury, Massachusetts on January 24, 2023. The victims were Cora (age 5), Dawson (age 3), and 8-month-old Callan. Cora and Dawson died at the scene. Callan was airlifted to Boston Children's Hospital where he survived for four days before dying from his injuries.
Lindsay Clancy had undiagnosed postpartum psychosis
Lindsay Clancy's defense argued she suffered from severe undiagnosed postpartum psychosis at the time she killed her three children. In fall 2022, when her youngest son was 5 months old, Patrick Clancy noticed signs of distress including several nights without sleep. By December, she exhibited severe depression, lack of sleep, and intrusive thoughts. She checked herself into McLean Psychiatric Hospital on New Year's Eve 2022 for depression treatment and was released 17 days before the murders.
Patrick Clancy states he forgave Lindsay Clancy for killing their children
Patrick Clancy stated he forgave his former wife Lindsay for killing their three children, despite not being asked for forgiveness. He explained his reasoning, saying that unforgiveness would consume him internally. He rejected dehumanizing media portrayals of Lindsay and attributed her actions to mental illness rather than malice.
Jury deadlocks in Lindsay Clancy murder trial
A jury deadlocked in the trial of Lindsay Clancy on charges of first-degree murder for killing her three children. Eleven of twelve jurors were prepared to acquit Clancy based on postpartum psychosis, but one juror sided with prosecutors who argued she understood her actions. The deadlock resulted in a mistrial being declared on September 4, 2026.
Patrick Clancy gives first television interview on CBS 60 Minutes
Patrick Clancy, former husband of Lindsay Clancy, gave his first televised interview on CBS News' 60 Minutes on September 21, 2026. In the interview, he discussed his forgiveness of his wife, his grief following the deaths of his three children, and his struggles with suicidal thoughts after the killings. He also addressed social media conspiracy theories and emphasized the importance of perinatal mental health awareness.
Patrick and Lindsay Clancy filed medical malpractice lawsuits against healthcare providers
Both Patrick Clancy and Lindsay Clancy brought lawsuits against healthcare providers who treated Lindsay for postpartum depression, alleging medical malpractice. The suits claim that adequate detection and treatment of her postpartum psychosis could have prevented the tragedy.
Lindsay Clancy jury declares mistrial after failing to reach verdict
Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial in the Lindsay Clancy case after jurors could not reach a unanimous verdict. The jury was split 11-1, with 11 jurors voting to find Clancy not criminally responsible for the deaths of her three children and one juror voting to convict her of first-degree murder.
Jury composition in Clancy trial revealed: 11 women, 1 man; single juror of color
The Clancy jury consisted of 12 members: 9 women and 3 men, with ages ranging from 22 to approximately 70 years old. According to juror Paula Devlin, there was only one person of color on the jury—the lone holdout juror who voted to convict, described as a Black man in his 30s.
Clancy's apparent coherency during alleged crimes became key jury dispute point
The fact that Lindsay Clancy appeared coherent and seemed capable of normal functioning during the alleged killings—including Googling information about her husband's CVS trip and speaking coherently with him by phone—was identified as a main point of contention for the holdout juror who could not reconcile this apparent coherency with the defense's claim of psychotic breakdown.
Clancy holdout juror refused to cite evidence supporting guilty verdict
Juror Nick Dargie stated that the lone holdout juror repeatedly refused to provide evidence or witness testimony to support his guilty verdict stance when asked by fellow jurors. Dargie said there was no single piece of evidence or witness testimony the holdout juror could cite to justify his position.
Clancy trial jurors initially split 8-2-2 at start of deliberations
At the beginning of jury deliberations in the Lindsay Clancy trial, jurors were divided: 8 leaning toward not guilty, 2 undecided, and 2 leaning toward guilty. Juror Paula Devlin stated she was initially leaning toward not responsible by reason of insanity based on the evidence presented.
Trial testimony depicted Clancy as devoted mother
During the 21-day trial, testimony consistently portrayed Lindsay Clancy as a devoted and loving mother. Juror Paula Devlin noted that nothing but positive statements were made about Clancy's parenting, including testimony from her ex-husband Patrick that did not contain damning assertions about her mothering abilities.
Clancy jury holdout juror recreated alleged crime method during deliberations
Juror Nick Dargie reported that the lone holdout juror took an exercise band and empty water bottle from evidence and demonstrated how he believed Clancy killed her children by pulling the band around the bottle. Dargie stated he was shocked by this action and believed the juror was acting inappropriately rather than following proper deliberation procedures.
Jury reported holdout juror refusing to follow court instructions on reasonable doubt
The jury foreperson submitted a note to the court stating that one juror was refusing to follow the court's instructions regarding the legal standard of reasonable doubt, prompting judicial intervention in the deliberation process.
Juror reports holdout provided no evidence for conviction vote
Juror Nick Dargie, 25, told ABC News that the lone holdout juror on the Lindsay Clancy jury did not provide any evidence or witness testimony to support his vote for conviction. Dargie stated he repeatedly asked the holdout juror to present evidence backing his position, but the juror could not do so. Dargie was one of three male jurors on the 12-person panel.
Multiple jurors describe holdout juror as arrogant and unresponsive
Multiple jurors who spoke publicly described the holdout juror negatively, with one juror characterizing him as very arrogant and noting he would not engage with other jurors' perspectives. Jurors reported the holdout juror completely disregarded information presented during testimony and in toxicology reports, despite other jurors attempting throughout deliberations to convince him to change his vote.
District Attorney has not announced decision on retrying Clancy
Plymouth County District Attorney Timothy Cruz stated he has not yet decided whether to retry Lindsay Clancy following the mistrial declaration. Cruz emphasized that prosecutors believe the evidence shows Clancy killed her three children and was in control of her actions when she committed the homicides. A court hearing was scheduled for September 29 to determine next steps.
Lindsay Clancy trial ends in mistrial after jury deadlock
The trial of Lindsay Clancy, a Massachusetts woman charged with first-degree murder in the 2023 deaths of her three children, ended in a mistrial on September 4 after jurors failed to reach a unanimous verdict following seven days of deliberations. The 12-person jury deadlocked 11-1, with 11 jurors favoring a not guilty by reason of insanity verdict and one juror holding out for conviction.
Jury deadlocked 11-1 on insanity defense in Clancy case
The jury in Lindsay Clancy's trial reached an 11-1 deadlock, with the majority favoring the defense argument that Clancy was not criminally responsible by reason of insanity. The defense contended that Clancy was experiencing postpartum psychosis and was overmedicated at the time of the killings, while prosecutors argued she deliberately killed her children and was in control of her actions.
Read the coverage
2 alternative perspectives
Mistrial ends Clancy case; jury deadlocked 11-1 on insanity verdict
Mistrial declared after 11-1 jury deadlock; Patrick Clancy forgives, remarries, and pursues healthcare accountability.
Social media conspiracy theories emerge about Patrick Clancy's involvement
Unverified conspiracy theories about Patrick Clancy circulate on social media despite verified trial facts.
Family rebuilds after trial: forgiveness, foundation, and moving forward
Patrick Clancy remarries, forgives, and establishes foundation to address systemic healthcare failures.
Mistrial concludes after jury deadlocks on insanity verdict
Mistrial declared after jury deadlocks 11-1; Patrick Clancy remarries and forgives; malpractice lawsuits filed.
Undiagnosed postpartum psychosis emerges as accountability focus in Clancy case
Undiagnosed postpartum psychosis and malpractice lawsuits highlight healthcare accountability gaps in the Clancy case.
Patrick Clancy moves forward: forgiveness, remarriage after tragedy
Patrick Clancy grants first interview stating forgiveness and announces remarriage to Dr. Rachel Denis.
Mistrial declared in Clancy case after jury deadlock
Mistrial declared after jury deadlocked 11-1 on insanity verdict, with one juror blocking consensus despite acknowledging reasonable doubt.
Trial evidence disputes whether Clancy was mentally capable during crimes
Jury split over whether defendant's apparent coherency proved she could be held criminally responsible.
Jury dysfunction emerges: holdout juror recreated crime, ignored instructions
Deliberating juror recreated crime method and ignored reasonable doubt instructions, causing mistrial.
Court examines how exercise bands were used in January 2023 killings
Trial evidence documented exercise bands as the cause of death in the three children's killings.
One juror's unexplained vote halts Lindsay Clancy trial proceedings
One juror's unexplained holdout vote deadlocked the jury 11-1, forcing a mistrial in the Clancy case.