Jury weighs five verdict options in Clancy murder trial deliberations
Jury begins deliberating among five verdict options in Clancy murder trial, deciding criminal responsibility despite psychiatric dispute.
Event / Security
High-profile infanticide cases and their connection to maternal mental health crises, including the Lindsay Clancy trial and related incidents involving mothers experiencing psychotic episodes.
2026-08-22 to 2026-11-07 · UTC publication dates
Coverage begins 22 Aug, 03:22 UTC
Follow the documented timeline or explore the related reporting.
The trial lasted 21 days. The jury heard testimony from 85 witnesses and reviewed more than 200 pieces of evidence before receiving the case for deliberation.
Lindsay Clancy is charged with first-degree murder in the deaths of her three children: Cora (age 5), Dawson (age 3), and Callan (8 months old). The deaths occurred on January 24, 2023, in their Duxbury home. Prosecutors allege Clancy used exercise bands to strangle the children. She has pleaded not guilty.
Prosecutors argued that Clancy deliberately planned the killings and knew right from wrong. They presented evidence that she mapped the distance and time to a pharmacy and restaurant, and that she only killed her children after sending her husband Patrick out to run errands, suggesting premeditation.
If the jury reports deadlocked again, Judge William Sullivan will meet with attorneys and issue Tuey-Rodriguez instructions, also known as a 'dynamite charge,' aimed at encouraging jurors to reach a verdict. This is a last resort instruction used in Massachusetts. If the jury deadlocks a third time, a mistrial will be declared.
If Clancy is convicted of first-degree murder, second-degree murder, or manslaughter, she will go to prison. If jurors find her not guilty by reason of insanity, she will be required to continue her stay at Tewksbury State Hospital, where her case will be reviewed periodically.
The jury in Lindsay Clancy's murder trial reported being unable to reach a unanimous decision on the fourth day of deliberations in Plymouth Superior Court. The jury of nine women and three men had deliberated for approximately 19 hours since receiving the case. Judge William Sullivan instructed them to continue deliberating. Clancy, 36, is charged with three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of her three children on January 24, 2023.
Defense attorney Kevin Reddington argued that Clancy was not criminally responsible for the deaths because she was suffering from severe postpartum psychosis intensified by prescription medications. Reddington claimed Clancy experienced hallucinations, including hearing a male voice directing her to kill her children and herself.
Prosecutors argue that Lindsay Clancy knew what she was doing when she killed her children. They contend she strangled them because she was depressed and tired of living, and that she made a conscious choice to kill them before attempting suicide.
The jury could find Lindsay Clancy guilty of murder, the lesser crime of manslaughter, or acquit her if it determines she was not in control of herself due to psychiatric problems. If convicted of murder, she could face a sentence as severe as life in prison. If acquitted, she could be released or remain confined in a mental health facility.
Three children — Cora (age 5), Dawson (age 3), and Callan Clancy (8 months) — were strangled with exercise bands in the basement of their family home in Duxbury, Massachusetts on January 24, 2023. The killings occurred while their father was obtaining takeout and at a pharmacy.
Lindsay Clancy, age 36 and originally from Wallingford, Connecticut, has pleaded not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility. She did not testify during the trial, but jurors heard testimony from medical professionals who treated her and from friends and relatives who were told about her mental health problems.
Lindsay Clancy's defense team argues that she killed her children because she had lost her grip on reality due to postpartum psychosis, a rare mental illness that can follow childbirth. In the months before the killings, Clancy sought treatment for worsening mental health, including a stay in a psychiatric hospital. The killings occurred less than three weeks after her discharge from psychiatric hospitalization.
Jurors in the Lindsay Clancy trial resumed deliberations on Monday, August 31, 2026, for a third day to determine whether the former labor and delivery nurse should be held criminally responsible for killing her three children in January 2023. The jury consists of 12 regular jurors and six alternates who began deliberating on Thursday, August 28, 2026, after a five-week trial with testimony from more than 70 prosecution witnesses and 10 defense witnesses.
After strangling her three children, Lindsay Clancy cut herself and jumped from a second-floor window in an apparent suicide attempt on January 24, 2023. She survived the attempt but remains paralyzed from the waist down.
Clancy's defense attorneys argue that she was in the grip of postpartum psychosis, a rare condition that can alter new mothers' sense of reality and is considered a psychiatric emergency. They contend this condition compelled her to act on voices in her head instructing her to kill her three children and herself.
Lindsay Clancy, 36, is accused of murdering her three children — Cora, 5; Dawson, 3; and Callan, 8 months — on January 24, 2023. After killing the children, she threw herself out her bedroom window in a failed suicide attempt.
Clancy called a suicide crisis hotline in December 2022 and sought inpatient psychiatric treatment. She was evaluated by clinicians at the Aspire crisis line but was told she did not meet criteria for inpatient admission due to not having a specific plan for suicide. She was also discharged after being referred to Women & Infants Hospital in Rhode Island despite clinicians noting continued passive suicidal ideation.
Dr. Veerle Bergink, director of Mount Sinai's Women's Mental Health Center, stated that trial testimony shows Clancy's diagnosis was missed on multiple occasions and she did not receive appropriate treatment. Bergink noted that Clancy's adverse reaction to antidepressants could have been a major clue that her condition involved postpartum psychosis rather than postpartum depression, requiring different medication.
During the trial, Clancy's medical providers testified that at times they did not have full access to her complete medical records and did not coordinate with one another. It was also unclear when Clancy stopped taking certain medications and began taking new ones, highlighting systemic communication failures across the healthcare system.
In the four months before the killings, Clancy was prescribed 13 medications by various providers as they attempted to treat her ongoing psychiatric symptoms and adverse reactions to medications. These included antidepressants (sertraline, trazodone, fluoxetine, mirtazapine, amitriptyline), benzodiazepines (lorazepam, clonazepam, diazepam), an antipsychotic (quetiapine), and other psychiatric medications.
Jury begins deliberating among five verdict options in Clancy murder trial, deciding criminal responsibility despite psychiatric dispute.
Jury deliberations begin in Clancy trial; insanity verdict will determine criminal responsibility.
Prosecution expert testified Clancy planned killings despite mental health crisis, disputing psychosis defense.
Jury decides if postpartum psychosis eliminated Clancy's criminal responsibility for admitted killings; conviction means life, acquittal means psychiatric commitment.
Jury will decide if Clancy understood her actions were wrong when she killed her three children.
Three children killed in Duxbury; trial centers on whether postpartum psychosis negates criminal responsibility.
Prosecution's forensic psychologist testified Clancy was criminally responsible; defense disputed the expert's credibility.
Three children killed in January 2023; Clancy pleads not guilty despite admitting the killings.
Expert testimony concludes; conflicting psychiatric assessments define trial's final phase before jury decides verdict.
Prosecutors argue Clancy acted with deliberate intent despite documented mental health crisis.
Clancy pleads not guilty despite admitting to the killings, contesting criminal responsibility based on mental health claims.
Community supporters gathered at courthouse during trial's final phase.